Roof needs replaced, who is right?Situation: 18 y.o house. Home inspection addendum states "LIcensed roofer shall repair/replace missing shingles and any leaks in the roof. Licensed roofer shall certify the roof after completion of all work". The normal certifcation time in this area is 2 years. The roofer fixed the leak the home inspector found but did not want to certify the roof due to its "condition". The sellers got another roofer that found more repairs, then DID certify the roof for 1 year. The roofer said thoug that they normally do 2 years but could not do so because of the condition of this roof and age. They stated the roof would likely need to be replaced within 1 year anyway. Buyer requests credit for new roof. What is considered fair? What would be the letter of the contract as far as seller's obligations? Is the buyer within full right to talk away because the certification does not conform to the normal 2 year for the area? If other items on the addendum were requested to be removed by seller, and buyer agreed verbally but did not sign revised addendum, is the addendum still considered "in negotiation" therefore the buyer could agree to add credit for new roof to addendum? Thank you!December 10 2012 - Baltimore00YesReport a ProblemProblemSelect oneOffensive contentIrrelevant contentSpam (pure self-promotion)OtherDetailsYour emailPlease enter a valid email address.Submit CancelContent flaggedWe will review this content. Thanks for helping make the site more useful to everyone. To learn more, read Zillow's Good Neighbor Policy.We're sorry. This service is temporarily unavailable. Please come back later and try again.