I’ve had a number of conversations with one of my all time favorite real estate experts, Jeff “Bawld Guy” Brown, about the data that has been moving the markets lately. A couple of thoughts about the numbers…..
- If you take the numbers on their own, they stink. Rotten, lousy, bad, any adjective you want, they can fit it.
- If you compare the numbers with the numbers from 3 to 6 months ago, they are pretty good.
And there in lies the problem.
Do we look at the numbers and say, “Wow, things are getting a lot better, it’s a great time to __________________” (fill in the blank with your choice).
Or do we look at the numbers and say, “Hmmm, I’m somewhat skeptical of the numbers I’m hearing. I hope that they do pan out to showing that the worst is over, but I’m going to take a bit more cautious of a view?”
If you ask Jeff Brown, he’ll say that part of the reason for my taking the second view is because I’m from Michigan. Remember, Michigan doesn’t even show up on the list of “investment opportunities” for Jeff (according to him) due to our wonderful growing employment base and booming real estate market (okay - not quite).
If you ask me, I’ll say that my skeptical view is because:
- Many of the people who I talk to and help with mortgage financing look to me for advice and guidance on what’s happening in the market. That, by it’s very nature, pushes me toward the side of being more cautious rather than less cautious.
- If I’m too skeptical, and this is a real recovery, then the Straight Talk that I’m giving out will work any way. For instance, most days, if you read my Mortgage Market Updates, you’ll find that I’m recommending that you lock rates. I’m doing so for two main reasons: 1) I believe that the “bailout” tab that the government is running up is going to come back and bite us eventually and in a big way. 2) I believe it’s a prudent financial strategy to lock in the gains that are available from the current rates rather than gamble them away in hopes of a lower rate. So what if I’m wrong and rates drop? Have you ever heard of the term REFINANCE?
Do I have any incontrovertible data or theories that say that we aren’t starting down the road to recovery? No I don’t.
But I do want to make a couple of points:
- Every single supposedly “positive” report lately has required an asterisk. The Case Shiller house prices posted the biggest gains in three years (IF you look at month to month rather than year over year). New home sales were up (compared to the prior month but down compared to last year). GDP was better than expected (but it was still 3.5% below what we need to maintain employment). It’s like every single report that has come out has needed spinning.
- I believe it was Dr. Nouriel Roubini, one of the leading economists with the best track record in the last few years, who summed up his view of the current status of things this way (and I’m paraphrasing) “The patient was rushed into the ER with life threatening injuries. The doctors were able to stabilize the patient and he is now resting comfortably, though heavily sedated, in the Critical Care Wing of the hospital. The extent of the patient’s injuries were enormous and the rehabilitation will take a very long time and the prognosis for total return to health in a relatively quick time frame is doubtful.”
- Credit losses - Whether you look at credit cards, car loans, home equity loans, mortgages, commercial loans or any other type of loan, the delinquencies that are occuring are rising and in many cases rising exponentially. This says to me that we aren’t done with the problems yet.
- Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac - I spent 2 hours this morning on a conference call going through the coming changes with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. A couple of main points: 1) They are obviously still struggling to keep their books clean because every single one of the changes is either a clarification or in most cases a tightening of the rules. 2) If everything was going well, they would be looking to make things easier and grow their book of business.
Is this the Mother of All Head Fakes? I’m afraid it is, but I’ll be honest with you, I don’t know. I also know that anyone who tells you that they KNOW what’s going to happen shouldn’t be trusted.
But I do know this - make your real estate and investing and mortgage plans assuming that it is the MOAHF and if we’re wrong and things are indeed heading up on a V shaped recovery, you’ll be sitting just fine either way.
In case you noticed, I haven’t said which side of the discussion Jeff comes in at. There’s two reasons for that:
- I know he’s going to be reading this and I’d like you to hear it from him directly.
- Jeff and I have a very unique professional relationship in that we will quite often disagree on issues but both know that we have substantative and quantifiable (how are those for big words?) reasons for it and can respect the differences.
I’d rather go down in the books as a mortgage lender who called it the way he sees it and helped people navigate the most difficult market in decades than I would blend into the crowd as just another lender who gets people further in debt.
Housing Bottom No, the Mother of All Head Fakes: Tech Ticker, Yahoo! Finance
From The Business Insider, July 31, 2009:
Housing bears immediately tried to poke holes in the surprisingly good numbers in the May Case Shiller report.
The most widespread bear argument, that the rise was just seasonal, is weak: Even the seasonally adjusted numbers were the best in three years.
Two other arguments, however, are more persuasive.
Whitney Tilson of T2 Partners calls the May numbers “the mother of all head fakes.” He–and the two analysts below–think house prices will resume their decline in the fall. We’re in that camp, too…
Bear Case 1: The Seasonal Adjustments Are Too Weak
The first argument against reading too much into the May numbers, made by Calculated Risk, is that the “seasonal adjustment” factor used by Case Shiller is not strong enough. Under this theory, a more appropriate seasonal adjustment would have showed a steeper decline in seasonally adjusted May numbers.
To support this argument, Calculated Risk plots the non-seasonally adjusted Case Shiller numbers (blue) and the seasonally adjusted ones (red). He notes that, during the 1990s, the seasonally adjusted numbers smoothed the seasonal variations to a relatively flat line (as they should). In the nutty 2000s, however, the seasonal adjustments produced wild swings that almost tracked the non-seasonal adjustments–thus defeating the purpose of attempting to “seasonally adjust” the numbers at all.
Thus, in Calculated Risk’s opinion, house prices will start falling sharply again in the fall, when the seasonal boost peters out.
Bear Case 2: It’s Just A Mix Issue
The second bear argument, made by Mark Hanson, is even more persuasive. In a nutshell, Hanson argues that the strong Case Shiller numbers were just due to a temporary seasonal change in the mix of houses sold–with “organic sales” (normal, voluntary, free-market sales) becoming a larger percentage of the overall sales than they were in the winter, when distressed foreclosure sales dominated.
In 2008, Mark’s argument goes, foreclosures climbed steadily through the year. Most foreclosures in 2008 were on lower-end, subprime houses that plummeted in price as banks dumped them at distressed prices. This year, however–at least in California–foreclosures have stayed relatively flat (at a high level).
Meanwhile, the organic sales market–sellers who actually want to sell–picks up each summer. In recent years, with most foreclosures taking place at the low-end of the market, the organic sales market has tended to include higher-priced houses that aren’t sold in distress.
Last summer, rising low-priced foreclosures overwhelmed the seasonal spike in high-priced organic sales, so average houses prices kept falling. This year, however, with flatter foreclosures, the seasonal spike in organic sales is having a far larger impact. Thus, in the past few months, the median sale price has risen.
In other words, Hanson attributes the rise in the Case Shiller index to a seasonal mix issue, not a bottoming in national prices.
August 1, 2009