Rent Went Up But So Did the Freebies (June Rent Report)
Rent growth accelerated. And yet, the share of listings with a concession remains elevated.
Rent growth accelerated. And yet, the share of listings with a concession remains elevated.
Fewer apartments are sitting empty, rents are climbing, and yet the deals keep coming. The typical U.S. asking rent rose to $1,965, up 2.2% compared to a year ago, and nearly 2 in 5 rental listings came with a concession attached. For property managers, that means pricing power isn’t back yet.
A concession is a move-in discount, commonly a free month’s rent, waived fees or free parking. For renters who land a freebie, the real cost of renting can be softer than the asking price suggests. The 2.2% annual rent growth in June is a slight acceleration from the previous month. Yet the increase in concessions — 39.7% of rental listings on Zillow offered one in June, up from 35.2% a year ago — softens the blow for renters.
The backdrop is a rental market that has added significant new inventory over the past few years, giving renters more choices. Meanwhile, the cost of buying a home remains high, keeping many in the rental market longer. That combination is driving both trends: enough demand to keep absorption elevated and sufficient supply to keep the rental vacancy rate elevated.
The payoff from recent construction activity is now clearly benefiting renters. Housing supply remains the most direct long-term lever for keeping rents in check, and markets that invested in new housing are rewarding renters with more choices, better concessions, and more competitive pricing. Areas that fell short on development are now seeing the consequences in their rent growth and affordability numbers.
Rent growth has been consistent this spring: April, May and June all posted stronger month-over-month gains than the same months in 2025.
The rapid climb in the number of available rental units is slowing, in large part because the apartment construction wave that flooded the market is finally receding: building completions fell further in the second quarter, while net absorption continued to increase.
With demand holding steady and the flow of new apartments slowing, conditions are expected to tighten gradually across the country. That means the elevated concession rates renters are seeing today reflect a market still working through its inventory. As that process plays out, deals are expected to become less common even as rent growth stays measured.
The markets with the highest concession rates are where the most new apartments were built and where renters have the most options today. Charlotte (67.1%), Denver (65.9%) and Dallas (64.6%) top the list. Rents have declined in San Antonio (-1.8% to $1,416), Austin (-1.7% to $1,653) and Denver (-1.3% to $1,930) over the past year. In these markets, renters are seeing the direct benefit of the new supply that has come online.
Where the market is tightest, rents are rising fastest. San Francisco leads the nation in rent growth, up 8.2% annually to $3,301, with just 24.9% of listings offering a concession. San Jose rents rose 6.2% to $3,729, while Chicago rents climbed 5.2% to $2,275. For renters in these markets, the window to negotiate is considerably narrower.
Single-family rents rose 3% year over year to $2,320, roughly double the 1.5% gain for multifamily units, now at $1,789. A disproportionately larger increase in the number of apartment units gave renters in that segment more options to choose from, also pulling down rent growth when compared to single-family rentals.
Looking ahead, rent growth is expected to remain moderate. Zillow forecasts single-family rents to rise 3.1%, and multifamily rents to increase 2% for 2026, roughly in line with 2025. For renters, that means the deals available today are unlikely to disappear overnight, but as new supply is absorbed, conditions could begin to gradually tighten.
| Metro | Concession Share | Concession Year over Year (YoY) | Typical Rent, Zillow Observed Rent Index (ZORI) | Rent YoY | Income Needed |
| United States | 39.7% | 4.5% | $1,965 | 2.2% | $78,600 |
| New York, NY | 17.2% | 1.3% | $3,573 | 4.5% | $142,933 |
| Los Angeles, CA | 32.5% | 2.9% | $2,927 | 1.5% | $117,090 |
| Chicago, IL | 23.3% | 2.6% | $2,275 | 5.2% | $91,014 |
| Dallas, TX | 64.6% | 9.2% | $1,673 | 0% | $66,938 |
| Houston, TX | 54.0% | 7.2% | $1,648 | -0.1% | $65,918 |
| Washington, DC | 54.8% | 4.2% | $2,448 | 0.1% | $97,916 |
| Philadelphia, PA | 31.8% | 3.0% | $1,928 | 3.6% | $77,128 |
| Miami, FL | 27.8% | 2.7% | $2,695 | 1.2% | $107,784 |
| Atlanta, GA | 58.2% | 5.3% | $1,854 | 1.9% | $74,159 |
| Boston, MA | 29.5% | 4.8% | $3,210 | 2.6% | $128,416 |
| Phoenix, AZ | 61.0% | 6.0% | $1,733 | 0% | $69,339 |
| San Francisco, CA | 24.9% | 8.9% | $3,301 | 8.2% | $132,059 |
| Riverside, CA | 29.9% | 3.1% | $2,539 | 2.3% | $101,570 |
| Detroit, MI | 25.3% | 2.8% | $1,518 | 3.2% | $60,713 |
| Seattle, WA | 52.4% | 6.7% | $2,269 | 1.4% | $90,763 |
| Minneapolis, MN | 40.0% | 0.4% | $1,727 | 3.4% | $69,061 |
| San Diego, CA | 37.4% | 4.1% | $2,991 | 1.7% | $119,620 |
| Tampa, FL | 52.5% | 11.3% | $2,020 | -0.7% | $80,812 |
| Denver, CO | 65.9% | 4.4% | $1,930 | -1.3% | $77,188 |
| Baltimore, MD | 37.7% | 1.0% | $1,936 | 2.2% | $77,433 |
| St. Louis, MO | 28.9% | 6.5% | $1,459 | 4.0% | $58,369 |
| Orlando, FL | 55.2% | 5.7% | $1,972 | 0.7% | $78,874 |
| Charlotte, NC | 67.1% | 6.0% | $1,750 | 0.5% | $69,989 |
| San Antonio, TX | 56.9% | 6.1% | $1,416 | -1.8% | $56,633 |
| Portland, OR | 48.0% | 6.2% | $1,805 | 0.4% | $72,214 |
| Sacramento, CA | 31.8% | 2.8% | $2,308 | 2.0% | $92,327 |
| Pittsburgh, PA | 25.8% | 5.1% | $1,523 | 3.6% | $60,921 |
| Cincinnati, OH | 32.6% | 12.6% | $1,583 | 2.8% | $63,306 |
| Austin, TX | 64.3% | 3.6% | $1,653 | -1.7% | $66,132 |
| Las Vegas, NV | 57.1% | 15.5% | $1,748 | 0.3% | $69,910 |
| Kansas City, MO | 34.8% | 7.7% | $1,545 | 3.4% | $61,803 |
| Columbus, OH | 48.8% | 11.0% | $1,528 | 1.5% | $61,100 |
| Indianapolis, IN | 46.9% | 9.0% | $1,558 | 2.5% | $62,327 |
| Cleveland, OH | 24.7% | 2.0% | $1,474 | 4.0% | $58,967 |
| San Jose, CA | 23.7% | -13.2% | $3,729 | 6.2% | $149,179 |
| Nashville, TN | 64.0% | 6.4% | $1,810 | 0.4% | $72,418 |
| Virginia Beach, VA | 21.8% | -4.9% | $1,878 | 5.5% | $75,104 |
| Providence, RI | 11.4% | -0.1% | $2,172 | 3.5% | $86,872 |
| Jacksonville, FL | 50.2% | 3.1% | $1,708 | 1.2% | $68,316 |
| Milwaukee, WI | 18.3% | -4.5% | $1,552 | 4.2% | $62,085 |
| Oklahoma City, OK | 29.7% | 3.3% | $1,393 | 2.8% | $55,708 |
| Raleigh, NC | 64.1% | 4.6% | $1,689 | 0.3% | $67,559 |
| Memphis, TN | 43.3% | 8.4% | $1,435 | 0.7% | $57,386 |
| Richmond, VA | 47.4% | 7.7% | $1,772 | 3.3% | $70,863 |
| Louisville, KY | 44.5% | 11.1% | $1,385 | 2.3% | $55,404 |
| New Orleans, LA | 19.3% | 7.2% | $1,617 | 0.8% | $64,679 |
| Salt Lake City, UT | 64.2% | 8.2% | $1,638 | 0.6% | $65,513 |
| Hartford, CT | 20.7% | 0.6% | $2,013 | 3.1% | $80,518 |
| Buffalo, NY | 10.1% | 2.9% | $1,461 | 3.1% | $58,435 |
| Birmingham, AL | 39.2% | 14.8% | $1,462 | 1.2% | $58,497 |
*Table ordered by market size